Comments on: Higgins vs. Virtual Directory http://beachhouse.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/higgins-vs-virtual-directory/ For now, this blog is about digital identity and all the happenings in that space. My opinions are influenced by many but are still only mine, I represent no one. Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:33:27 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Albina-gc http://beachhouse.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/higgins-vs-virtual-directory/#comment-4312 Albina-gc Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:24:47 +0000 http://beachhouse.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/higgins-vs-virtual-directory/#comment-4312 vmicq смотреть порно видео ролики qip com скачать qip 9022 infium самая новая версия icq

]]> By: Pete Rowley » Higgins: lego brick or gear stick? http://beachhouse.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/higgins-vs-virtual-directory/#comment-69 Pete Rowley » Higgins: lego brick or gear stick? Thu, 12 Oct 2006 22:22:11 +0000 http://beachhouse.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/higgins-vs-virtual-directory/#comment-69 [...] Mike Beach is obviously a fellow who likes to ask the hard questions. This time he is asking how Higgins differs from a virtual directory. There is some level of confusion out there so in order to add a little clarity my answer would be that the difference is one of perspective and granularity. QED. [...] [...] Mike Beach is obviously a fellow who likes to ask the hard questions. This time he is asking how Higgins differs from a virtual directory. There is some level of confusion out there so in order to add a little clarity my answer would be that the difference is one of perspective and granularity. QED. [...]

]]> By: Mike Beach http://beachhouse.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/higgins-vs-virtual-directory/#comment-41 Mike Beach Sat, 23 Sep 2006 00:50:34 +0000 http://beachhouse.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/higgins-vs-virtual-directory/#comment-41 Dave, Thanks for the pointer to Penrose, I am not looking for a virtual directory but it is great to know these things are out there. Could you elaborate just a little, or point me to something that elaborates on the more and less answer? What I have seen so far (and a number of my colleagues agree) is this is a virtual directory. It seems a bit more extensible by design than some current products and claims user-centricity, but it sure looks like a virtual directory. Since you and others have disagreed with this point of view I am trying to identify the significant distinctions so that I can communicate them and understand the implications - after all, this does seem to be some of the leading edge. Mike Dave,

Thanks for the pointer to Penrose, I am not looking for a virtual directory but it is great to know these things are out there. Could you elaborate just a little, or point me to something that elaborates on the more and less answer?

What I have seen so far (and a number of my colleagues agree) is this is a virtual directory. It seems a bit more extensible by design than some current products and claims user-centricity, but it sure looks like a virtual directory.

Since you and others have disagreed with this point of view I am trying to identify the significant distinctions so that I can communicate them and understand the implications – after all, this does seem to be some of the leading edge.

Mike

]]> By: Dave Kearns http://beachhouse.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/higgins-vs-virtual-directory/#comment-40 Dave Kearns Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:28:09 +0000 http://beachhouse.wordpress.com/2006/09/22/higgins-vs-virtual-directory/#comment-40 The Penrose project is the Open Source virtual directory, Mike. Higgins is both more than, and quite a bit less than, a virtual directory. The Penrose project is the Open Source virtual directory, Mike. Higgins is both more than, and quite a bit less than, a virtual directory.

]]>